[EdLUG] COBOL Prorammers ?
Jeremy Nicoll
jn.ml.elx.813 at letterboxes.org
Sun Apr 5 19:25:18 UTC 2020
On Sun, 5 Apr 2020, at 19:13, Mark Turner wrote:
> The article made me laugh, but COBOL is still good at what it does,
> simple repetitive stuff on fixed width data files, and its very fast at
> doing that.
A long long time ago I wrote a structured text editor (which worked a bit
like an XML editor following a DTD in that it allowed the user to populate
variable length text fields within a predefined structure with optional
parts and nested sybstructres) ... in COBOL. It wasn't - by a long way - my
choice of implementation language, but it was the one my employers
forced me to use. Variable length strings were held in heap-like constructs
which - yes - did reside in fixed-width data files - but were sort-of paged in
and out of them. That is the total amount of working storage in use for
a large document was well in excess of the much smaller amount that the
compiler was able to address at any one moment.
--
Jeremy Nicoll - my opinions are my own.
More information about the EdLUG
mailing list